History that Judges, History that Forgives
If there is a public demand for history these days, it's for it to judge: judge in order to condemn. Because the more history condemns, the more it represses and removes. This process of 'legalizing' history, as Odo Marquard was among the first to define it, has become impossible to control. Historical knowledge has become a tool for political stabilization, a clash between dogmas destined to be translated into institutional ideologies, judge of public memory where the "great collective players act despite what historiography wants and knows how to do: here in pursuit of such great accusations as to become pardons without right of appeal, here proposing a mea culpa somewhere between pardon, penitence and self-amnesty, the pawn of violent games between opinions about a history that becomes a means to very different ends".